Pass4Future also provide interactive practice exam software for preparing Cisco Conducting Threat Hunting and Defending using Cisco Technologies for CyberOps (300-220) Exam effectively. You are welcome to explore sample free Cisco 300-220 Exam questions below and also try Cisco 300-220 Exam practice test software.
Do you know that you can access more real Cisco 300-220 exam questions via Premium Access? ()
After completing several successful hunts using Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Secure Endpoint, the SOC wants to ensure long-term defensive improvement. Which action BEST represents a mature threat hunting outcome?
Answer : C
The correct answer is converting hunt findings into permanent detection rules. This action reflects the highest maturity outcome of threat hunting.
Threat hunting is not complete until discoveries are:
Documented
Operationalized
Automated where appropriate
Without converting findings into detections, SOC teams repeatedly rediscover the same threats, wasting time and effort.
Options A and B increase noise and risk false positives. Option D improves experience but does not institutionalize knowledge.
Cisco's CBRTHD blueprint emphasizes:
Continuous improvement
Detection engineering
Feedback loops between hunting and monitoring
By creating permanent detections, organizations:
Reduce dwell time
Improve consistency
Increase adversary cost
Therefore, Option C is the correct and most Cisco-aligned answer.
A SOC team using Cisco security technologies wants to distinguish Indicators of Attack (IOAs) from Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) during threat hunting. Which scenario BEST represents an IOA rather than an IOC?
Answer : C
The correct answer is Observation of repeated failed logins followed by a successful login from a new location. This scenario represents an Indicator of Attack (IOA) because it reflects attacker behavior in progress, not confirmed compromise.
IOAs focus on patterns of malicious intent, such as credential abuse, reconnaissance, or lateral movement, even when no malware or known indicators are present. In this case, the sequence of failed authentication attempts followed by a successful login from an unusual location strongly suggests password spraying or credential stuffing, both common initial access techniques.
Options A, B, and D are classic Indicators of Compromise (IOCs). Hashes, domains, and IP addresses are static artifacts that indicate a system has already been compromised. These indicators sit low on the Pyramid of Pain and are easy for attackers to change.
Cisco's CBRTHD blueprint emphasizes hunting for IOAs because they enable:
Earlier detection
Reduced dwell time
Higher attacker cost
Cisco tools such as Secure Network Analytics, Secure Endpoint, and SIEM platforms are designed to correlate behavioral signals like authentication anomalies rather than relying solely on known bad indicators.
Therefore, Option C is the correct and Cisco-aligned answer.
A threat hunter uses Cisco Secure Endpoint to investigate a suspected credential-harvesting attack that does not involve dropping files to disk. Which capability is MOST critical for detecting this activity?
Answer : B
The correct answer is endpoint process ancestry tracking. Credential harvesting attacks frequently rely on fileless execution and living-off-the-land techniques.
When no files are written to disk, hash-based detection (Option A) is ineffective. Email sandboxing (Option C) and URL filtering (Option D) may detect initial delivery but provide little visibility into post-execution behavior.
Cisco Secure Endpoint provides detailed telemetry on:
Parent-child process relationships
Unexpected process spawning
Abnormal command-line arguments
Memory-resident execution
By analyzing process ancestry, hunters can identify suspicious chains such as:
Office applications spawning scripting engines
Browsers spawning credential-harvesting processes
Legitimate binaries launching unexpected child processes
This capability directly supports MITRE ATT&CK Credential Access and Defense Evasion techniques and is explicitly covered in the CBRTHD exam objectives related to endpoint-based threat hunting.
Thus, Option B is the most accurate and Cisco-aligned answer.
After completing a threat hunt that uncovered previously undetected credential abuse, the SOC wants to ensure long-term improvement in detection and response capabilities. Which action BEST represents the final and most critical phase of the threat hunting lifecycle?
Answer : B
The correct answer is documenting findings and updating detection logic. This represents the post-hunt operationalization phase, which is critical for long-term security improvement.
While options A and C are necessary response actions, they address only the current incident. Threat hunting's strategic value comes from transforming discoveries into repeatable detections, playbooks, and controls.
Professional threat hunting programs ensure that:
Successful hunts produce new SIEM rules
Detection gaps are closed
Findings are documented for future analysts
Lessons learned inform security architecture decisions
Option D continues exploration but fails to institutionalize knowledge. Without operationalizing results, organizations repeatedly rediscover the same threats.
This phase directly increases maturity in the Threat Hunting Maturity Model, shifting organizations from hero-driven hunting to scalable, resilient detection. It also moves defenders up the Pyramid of Pain, forcing adversaries to change tactics rather than indicators.
Therefore, option B is the correct and most strategically important answer.
A security operations team is transitioning from alert-driven investigations to a mature threat hunting program. The team wants to focus on detecting adversaries who intentionally evade signature-based tools and traditional SIEM alerts by using legitimate credentials and native system utilities. Which hunting focus best supports this objective?
Answer : C
The correct answer is analyzing abnormal behavior patterns across identity, endpoint, and network telemetry. This approach represents the foundation of modern threat hunting and directly addresses adversaries who deliberately avoid traditional detections.
Advanced attackers increasingly rely on living-off-the-land techniques, stolen credentials, and legitimate administrative tools such as PowerShell, WMI, RDP, and cloud APIs. These activities rarely generate malware signatures or known IOCs, making alert-driven and signature-based defenses insufficient. As a result, mature threat hunting programs shift focus toward behavioral analysis and anomaly detection.
Option A and D rely on static indicators such as IPs, domains, and hashes. These sit at the lowest levels of the Pyramid of Pain and are trivial for attackers to change. Option B is purely reactive and limited to known malware, offering little value against stealthy intrusions.
By correlating identity logs (authentication patterns, geolocation anomalies), endpoint telemetry (process execution, parent-child relationships), and network activity (unusual connections, lateral movement patterns), hunters can detect Indicators of Attack (IOAs) rather than waiting for confirmed compromise. This enables identification of credential misuse, privilege abuse, and lateral movement even when no malware is present.
This methodology aligns with MITRE ATT&CK TTP-based hunting, which focuses on tactics and techniques instead of tools or infrastructure. It also reflects a higher tier in the Threat Hunting Maturity Model, where organizations proactively search for unknown threats rather than responding to alerts.
In professional SOC environments, this shift dramatically increases detection coverage against advanced adversaries and reduces dwell time. Therefore, option C is the most accurate and strategically sound answer.
